Which of these would not be a valid reason for revocation of a massage therapy license?

A referral from a client would not be a valid reason for revocation of a massage therapy license because it does not violate any regulations or ethical standards governing the practice. A referral typically indicates that a client is satisfied with the services provided and seeks to share that positive experience with others. It is an encouraging sign of a therapist's professionalism and competence, rather than a detriment or violation.

In contrast, failure to complete required continuing education demonstrates non-compliance with state regulations essential for maintaining a massage therapy license. This lack of ongoing education can undermine the quality of care provided. Similarly, a criminal conviction for certain offenses can directly affect a therapist's ability to practice safely and ethically, leading to revocation of their license. Engaging in professional misconduct refers to actions that violate the ethical guidelines and standards of practice, which can also result in disciplinary measures, including revocation. Thus, a refusal to comply with educational and ethical standards is serious and can have dire consequences for a licensure status.